Skip to main content

First day Sommelier education

On the first day we concentrated blind tasting techniques. We were served these wines without seeing the bottle and were asked to do a proper analyses in order to develop a logical answer. At each step we tried to conclude what it could potentially be or what we could exclude.

The first bottle (to the left) was pale yellow gren colour indicating no or very little oak influence. This was confirmed by the zingy and zesty smell with dominant gooseberry flavours indicating a potential Sauvignon Blanc. The taste was bone dry with a pronounced acidity. Again crispy flavours indicating no oak influence. Overall quality good and most people thinking Sauvignon Blanc which also was the correct answer.

The second wine had a more medium yellow colour and more tropical fruit flavours. Less acidity anymore body. The influence of oak was evident and many guessed Chardonnay from the new world.

The first red reminded me of Beaujolais on the colour. Medium purple. The nose was more towards ripe red and dark fruit with a certain"sweetness". Some infuence of flowers as well. That me drift towards Pinot Noir which was confirmed by the taste which offered a fruity well balanced wine (acid vs fruit). Medium to high acidity with very little tannins supported this argument. The slightly sweet aftertaste led us towards new world Pinot which is what it was.

The second red led us to believe it was an old wine by just looking at the colour; medium red with red brown rim. The nose however led me to Bordeaux due to the earthy, smoky, coffee like flavours. But there were some jammy flavours that suggested otherwise. The taste has high acidity, quite a lot of tanninsand a firm body that reminded me of Nebbiolo. The aftertaste had however some spice and vanilla which did not quite match that track. So when the guy next to me suggested Rioja it all came together. Vina Arana from 2008 based on tempranillo and some Viura, Mazuelo and Graciano. Key lesson is that Rioja is a blend and knottiest Tempranillo.

The last wine was obviously sweet white due to the deep yellow colour, viscosity, the complex sweet tropical fruit and honey. The very high acidity suggested that we should be away from Sauternes, which I thought it was. The best way to understand the difference between Botrytis sweet whites and ice wine is to the test them against each other.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bordeaux- Le prelat du Ch. Pape Clement 2004

This is one of two second wines of the famous and expensive Ch. Pape Clement in Graves. Although young,  2004, this wine drinks really well already if you put it on carafe a couple of hours before consumption. Dark red colour, with a very attractive smell of blueberries and dark berries, its a full bodied wine with firm but nice tannins that goes best with some food. 2004 although not the best of vintages, keep surprising me with good drinkable wines at affordable prices, because from 2005 and onwards there is a big step up in prices.... Grapes; Cabernet Sauvignon 60% and Merlot 40% Price around 20€ P+

Wine # 2 Blindtasting Ganddal

Deep dark purple colour. Dark berries, cherries and mint chocolate. Full bodied with soft tannins. Reminds me of an Amarone.. A very nice wine indeed. Panel is way out as it is from the Rhone valley. Gigondas 2009 by Guigal Score 17.60  Ca 20€ or 220 NOK

Ogier Chateauneuf du Pape 2010

This is a quite reasonable Chateauneuf du Pape (ca 200 NOK or 15€). The colour is medium ruby color which was a bit surprising. Nose of ripe black cherries and liquerice with a medium + body and finish with firm tannins. The wine can be drunk now but has definitely the potential for ageing (5-10 years). Chateauneuf du Pape 2010, Ogier Bring out the steak!